C. S. Lewis is really an extraordinary thinker and communicator.
Must re-read Mere Christianity
C. S. Lewis is really an extraordinary thinker and communicator.
Must re-read Mere Christianity
Perhaps it is as impossible to predict if a program will ever finish as it is to create a functional genome that cannot get cancer?
Another version of my favourite christmas carol
As a christian I would say it’s a wonderful time indeed, because we are – or at least should be – celebrating the birth of the most wonderful person in history, Jesus. He is one of those persons so unique that he does not need any qualifiers on his name. Just Jesus is enough and everyone knows who we’re talking about. Almost no one dislikes Jesus, one notable exception being Jews, maybe unaware that Jesus was one of them.
Even though it’s highly uncertain that Jesus was actually born on December 25th, this is a date that has been observed by christians for centuries. We have records of the birth of Jesus being remembered on this date as soon as the 4th century.
But nevermind all of that. And nevermind the fact that we know dates of death of early christian martyrs but have no idea when they were born. In fact birthday celebrations might have been completely foreign to early christians.
Nevermind the fact that Christmas has been highjacked by our capitalist/corporate world to push western consumerism to the max.
Nevermind the fact that most of the western world is so secularized that hardly anyone remembers that this was the date that we are supposed to celebrate Jesus’ birthday, a strange birthday indeed where everyone else gets the presents…
Regardless of all that, around 2 millennia ago JESUS WAS BORN! And we still feel the effects of that today! Let’s celebrate that!
Why is Jesus such an unique figure in history? Let me share some ideas I read here, expressed in a more eloquent manner than I ever could.
More than nineteen hundred years ago, there was a Man born contrary to the laws of life. This Man lived in poverty and was reared in obscurity. He did not travel extensively. Only once did He cross the boundary of the country in which He lived; that was during His exile in childhood. He possessed neither wealth nor influence. His relatives were inconspicuous and had neither training nor formal education. In infancy He startled a king; in childhood He puzzled doctors; in manhood He ruled the course of nature, walked upon the waves as pavement, and hushed the sea to sleep. He healed the multitudes without medicine and made no charge for His service. He never wrote a book, and yet perhaps all the libraries of the world could not hold the books that have been written about Him. He never wrote a song, and yet He has furnished the theme for more songs than all the songwriters combined. He never founded a college, but all the schools put together cannot boast of having as many students. He never marshaled an army, nor drafted a soldier, nor fired a gun; and yet no leader ever had more volunteers who have, under His orders, made more rebels stack arms and surrender without a shot fired. He never practiced psychiatry, and yet He has healed more broken hearts than all the doctors far and near. Once each week multitudes congregate at worshiping assemblies to pay homage and respect to Him. The names of the past, proud statesmen of Greece and Rome have come and gone. The names of the past scientists, philosophers, and theologians have come and gone. But the name of this Man multiplies more and more. Though time has spread nineteen hundred years between the people of this generation and the mockers at His crucifixion, He still lives. His enemies could not destroy Him, and the grave could not hold Him. He stands forth upon the highest pinnacle of heavenly glory, proclaimed of God, acknowledged by angels, adored by saints, and feared by devils, as the risen, personal Christ, our Lord and Savior.
There is no one else like Jesus. He said things that if said by someone else would be crazy.
Only a madman would say this. The people around him thought so
And when his family heard it, they went out to seize him, for they were saying, “He is out of his mind.”Mark 3:21
There was again a division among the Jews because of these words. Many of them said, “He has a demon, and is insane; why listen to him?”John 10:19-20
So, exactly what kinds of crazy things did Jesus say? Let’s review a couple of them, just from the book of John.
But Jesus answered them, “My Father is working until now, and I am working.” This was why the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.John 5:17-18
“For as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom he will. For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, that all may honor the Son, just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him.”John 5:21-23
Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst.”John 6:35
“Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.”John 6:54
Again Jesus spoke to them, saying, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”John 8:12
“My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand.”John 10:27-28
“I and the Father are one”John 10:30
Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”John 14:6
In summary, Jesus thought of himself as:
No wonder that most deemed him as a lunatic. If anyone else made this kind of affirmations he would have been labeled as mentally unstable! Once again we get into Lewis Trilemma. Assuming that the gospel of John is an accurate account of what Jesus actually said, either he was delusional about himself, trying to purposefully deceive his listeners or he was actually right!
Even though I’m reasonably confident on it’s reliability, it’s not mandatory to put all of the weight of this argument on John’s gospel. The other gospels also paint a picture of Jesus thinking this way about himself. Even if not all of the statements could be relied upon for historical truth, the fact is that Jesus didn’t think of himself as a mere man. The question is: was he right or was he wrong?
I’m not at all capable of thinking of Jesus as a liar or a lunatic, so I’ve made my decision.
If this Jesus of Nazareth is really who he said he was, the angel’s chorus was right to announce his birth by saying:
“Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men!”Luke 2:14
the police publicly admitted their interpretation of Finland’s law would make publishing the Bible a hate crimeThe Federalist
Is this an outlier or a trend that is here to stay?
do álbum SEM AÇÚCAR, de 1980 – letra de Lena dAgua, música de José da Ponte
anoiteceu, meu amor o dia desceu no mar
escrevo o teu nome na areia, o tempo parou por instantes
vagueavas sozinho na praia
juntei-me a ti, mergulhei no teu silêncio mágico
anoiteceu, meu amor, pressinto-te perto
corro descalça por ti, a lua poisou-te nos olhos
e soltei os cavalos do vento, demos as mãos
caminhámos num abraço eterno
tão ao longe
encontrei-te no mar, percorri-te de cor
nos teus braços de amor adormeci
embarquei no milagre que há em ti
perdi-me contigo no silêncio do cais
amanheceu, meu amor
por dentro nasceu o sol
sobes por mim devagar, procuras o céu no meu corpo
num sorriso os teus olhos encontram nos meus
mais uma estrela que se acendeu
em ti deslizo mansamente
Seems pretty straightforward
From Karl Popper’s “The Open Society and Its Enemies”. Are we abstract yet?
“As a consequence of its loss of organic character, an open society may become, by degrees, what I should like to term an ‘abstract society’. It may, to a considerable extent, lose the character of a concrete or real group of men, or of a system of such real groups. This point which has been rarely understood may be explained by way of an exaggeration. We could conceive of a society in which men practically never meet face to face — in which all business is conducted by individuals in isolation who communicate by typed letters or by telegrams, and who go about in closed motor-cars. (Artificial insemination would allow even propagation without a personal element.) Such a fictitious society might be called a ‘completely abstract or depersonalized society’. Now the interesting point is that our modern society resembles in many of its aspects such a completely abstract society. Although we do not always drive alone in closed motor cars (but meet face to face thousands of men walking past us in the street) the result is very nearly the same as if we did — we do not establish as a rule any personal relation with our fellow-pedestrians. Similarly, membership of a trade union may mean no more than the possession of a membership card and the payment of a contribution to an unknown secretary. There are many people living in a modern society who have no, or extremely few, intimate personal contacts, who live in anonymity and isolation, and consequently in unhappiness. For although society has become abstract, the biological make-up of man has not changed much; men have social needs which they cannot satisfy in an abstract society.”
It’s 2021, is it still an exaggeration?
A reasonable explanation of superposition
Who knew that arabs were buying sand….